NAPO LOGO

NAPO  
JUDGE FREDERICA MASSIAH-JACKSON WITHDRAWS HER NAME FROM CONSIDERATION

SENATOR ORRIN G. HATCH (R-UT) SAYS WITHDRAWAL “THE RIGHT THING TO DO,” CITING THE STRONG, BIPARTISAN OPPOSITION FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT GROUPS FOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT

March 17, 1998 - Judge Frederica Massiah-Jackson yesterday withdrew her nomination for the U.S. District Court bench, just one day before the Senate was expected to reject her nomination.  Senate opposition had grown so strong, Judge Massiah-Jackson risked becoming the first of President Clinton’s judicial nominees to be rejected.

As reported to you earlier, NAPO wrote Senators Orrin G. Hatch and Patrick J. Leahy, the Chairman and ranking Democrat of the Senate Judiciary Committee before her hearing in February to express our fervent belief that Judge Massiah-Jackson was not qualified for a lifetime appointment as a Federal judge.  Judge Massiah-Jackson has a proven record of being lenient on criminals, having a bias against the police, using expletives in court and being insensitive to the victims of crime.

In response to criticisms from NAPO, other police organizations, and district attorneys, the Judiciary Committee held a rare second hearing last week to give Judge Massiah-Jackson a chance to address those criticisms.  However, her answers failed to defend her past record as a state judge.  Yesterday, while the Senate held further debate, NAPO hand delivered a letter to every U.S. Senator prior to the Senate’s scheduled vote today.  Later that afternoon, the nomination was formally withdrawn by President Clinton at Judge Massiah-Jackson’s request.

The Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT) was quoted in the Washington Post with the following response to her withdrawal, “Given the strong, bipartisan opposition from law enforcement groups, her demonstrated leniency in sentencing convicted criminals and the Judiciary Committee’s concerns about her lack of candor throughout the nomination process, I believe that withdrawing the nomination is the right thing to do.”

NAPO still has grave concerns regarding the current level of vacant federal judgeships.  According to Senate Judiciary Committee figures, there are currently 83 vacancies in the federal judiciary and 42 nominations pending before the Senate.  It is imperative that we fill these vacancies as soon as possible; however, the Senate must be presented with qualified nominees.  Law enforcement colleagues asked for NAPO’s help in gaining support for judicial nominee Ms. Marsha Berzon to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering most of the Western United States).  After having contacted the Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC), NAPO is expressing our support for the nominee who we believe will be fair, impartial and open-minded to law enforcement.  If NAPO members would like to seek NAPO’s support for area nominees, please contact the NAPO office.

The National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO) is a coalition of police unions and associations from across the United States that serves in Washington, DC to advance the interests of America’s law enforcement officers through legislative and legal advocacy, political action and education.  Founded in 1978, NAPO now represents more than 4,000 police unions and associations, 250,000 sworn law enforcement officers, 3,000 retired officers and more than 100,000 citizens who share a common dedication to fair and effective crime control and law enforcement.

 
 


 

March 16, 1998

The Honorable
The United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator :

On behalf of the National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO), representing more than 4,000 police unions and associations and 250,000 sworn law enforcement officers nationwide, I am writing to you prior to tomorrow’s scheduled vote on the confirmation of judicial nominee, Federal District Judge Frederica A. Massiah-Jackson.  It is critical to the United States justice system that you vote against the confirmation of this judicial nominee.

Judge Massiah-Jackson has proven that she has a significant bias against law enforcement.  When given the chance last week, she failed to fully defend to the Judiciary Committee her history of being soft on criminals and biased against the police, in addition to her unprofessional conduct observed in the court room.  Judge Massiah-Jackson does not meet the standards to serve this country with a lifetime appointment as a federal judge.  Such an appointment would make a mockery of the United State’s justice system.

Every day, the men and women of law enforcement risk their lives to protect the public.  NAPO demands that their service be honored with the respect that is deserved, to confirm Judge Massiah-Jackson would be, in effect, a slap in their faces.  Please support our judicial system and the hardworking efforts of our nation’s law enforcement by voting against the confirmation of Judge Massiah-Jackson.

Thank you for your consideration regarding this important issue.  Senator X, we look forward to seeing your vote against this judicial nominee.  If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me, (202) 842-4420.

Sincerely,
 
 

Robert T. Scully
Executive Director


Table of Contents  email NAPO here!  NAPO PAGE LINKS